National Institute of Corrections
You are not signed in! To post comments and participate in discussions you need to sign in or create a free account.
New in the Library: California’s Female Realignment Report
NIC News & Updates

Subscribe

From the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation,  Female Realignment Report: An Examination of Female Offenders Released from State Prison in the First Year of Public Safety Realignment reviews “one year of One-Year Arrestreleases and one full year of follow-up data to evaluate how female offenders released from prison during the first year after implementation have fared ”.

Key findings from the report include the following:

Overall, data shows that there is very little difference between female offenders and their outcomes following release after completing their state prison term pre- and post-realignment (figure A). The post-realignment arrest rate was slightly higher than pre-realignment (1.5 percent), while the post-realignment conviction rate was slightly lower (1.2 percent).

 

 

Type of Return

Post-realignment, all of the female offenders who returned to prison did so for a new conviction rather than a parole violation. Because of realignment, only certain offenders are eligible to return to prison on a parole violation (e.g., third strikers, mentally disordered offenders). (figure B)

 

 

 

Access the full report


This announcement is available at NIC's Gender-Responsive News for Women and Girls.  Feel free to forward to friends and colleagues.  Subscribe to the newsletter at http://nicic.gov/go/subscribe.

For additional resources on Justice-Involved Women go to NIC’s Women Offenders.




Posted Tue, Aug 5 2014 7:15 AM by Susan Powell

Comments

Be the first to comment on this article!
You must sign in or create an account to comment.
Brought to you by:
National Institute of Corrections
U.S. Dept. of Justice | 320 First Street | Washington, DC 20534 | 800.995.6423

This blog is funded by a contract from the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.