National Institute of Corrections
You are not signed in! To post comments and participate in discussions you need to sign in or create a free account.
The Ethics of Empirics and Evidence in Isolation: Sustaining Critical Investigations and Promoting Best Practices

By Kristin G. Cloyes

ABSTRACT:  This article discusses the Colorado study on psychosocial effects of administrative segregation (AS) in relation to biomedical ethics and the obligations of clinicians and researchers working in prisons to promote autonomy, nonmalificense, beneficence, and justice. Applying this ethical framework, the article seeks to contextualize the Colorado study in relation to larger questions about AS and correctional health practice, and to expand discussion about AS effects to include the larger community of health care providers who understand bioethical principles as these inform  public health, human rights, and best practices. Specifically, framing discussion of AS practices within biomedical ethics highlights how empirics and evidence require interpretation within a clinically relevant ethical framework to be truly meaningful and relevant for health-related practice and research.




Posted Tue, Jun 21 2011 10:01 AM by Tracey Vessels

Comments

Be the first to comment on this article!
You must sign in or create an account to comment.
Brought to you by:
National Institute of Corrections
U.S. Dept. of Justice | 320 First Street | Washington, DC 20534 | 800.995.6423

This blog is funded by a contract from the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.