National Institute of Corrections
You are not signed in! To post comments and participate in discussions you need to sign in or create a free account.
Police Officers’ Perceptions of the 40-Hour Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) Curriculum

By Letheshia Husbands, Beth Broussard , Dana Hankerson-Dyson, Shaily Krishan, Janet R. Oliva, Barbara D'Orio, and Michael T. Compton


To date, the growing literature surrounding Crisis Intervention Team (CIT) training for law enforcement officers has lacked an examination of the 40-hour curriculum, a core component of the overarching CIT model, in terms of officers' perceptions and preferences.  This study examined officers' opinions of a state-supported CIT curriculum through a self-report questionnaire administered to 252 previously CIT-trained officers.  The survey collected data on the most important things learned, rankings of the three major components of the training (lectures, site visits, and de-escalation role playing), and ideas for improvement and expansion.  Findings revealed a strong preference for interaction in the classroom and the gaining of directly applicable skills; officers rated role-play scenarios as the most useful and meaningful aspect of the training week.  Encouragement of active learning through the application of adult education principles presents opportunities for strengthening the current curriculum to be maximally relevant to police officers.  Further research into best formats for education in the law enforcement community and examination of current CIT curricula is necessary to sustain and improve this model of collaboration between law enforcement and mental health.

Posted Thu, Aug 4 2011 4:11 PM by Tracey Vessels
Attachment: Husbands.pdf


Be the first to comment on this article!
You must sign in or create an account to comment.
Brought to you by:
National Institute of Corrections
U.S. Dept. of Justice | 320 First Street | Washington, DC 20534 | 800.995.6423

This blog is funded by a contract from the National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice.